"Yes, but ... they wouldn't do anything against the law to get gold."
"Wouldn't they?" said Ron, looking skeptical. "I dunno ..  they don't  exactly mind breaking rule, do they?"
"Yes, but this is the law," said Hermione, looking scared. "This  isn't some silly school rule .... They'll get a lot more than detention  for blackmail! Ron ... maybe you'd better tell Percy...."
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, 568-569.
I find it very interesting that the antithesis being set up here is  between rules which count (the law) and rules which don't (silly school  rules). Rather than pointing out that rules like school rules and house  rules are to prepare children to accept the legitimacy and authority of  state rules, we have accepted a dichotomy that says rules at home and  school are OK to break, so long as sometime, somewhere, children learn  the difference between the ones that matter and the ones that don't. But where are children supposed to learn this difference, as if it existed, if not at home and at school. Why are we surprised when students who break rules at home and school continue their rule breaking after they have left home and school? We have never taught them not to!
No comments:
Post a Comment